Legal Opinion

Marshall Field Co. v. Oren Ruffcorn Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 21, 1902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from TJnion District Gourt. — Hon. W. H. Tedeord, Judge. The defendant appeals from judgment for the amount due on three promissory notes.

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, O. J. —

1 2 In. this action recovery is sought on three promissory notes signed “Oren Ruffcorn Oo., per- Oren Ruffcorn, President.” In the first division of the answer the defendant denied their execution, and, while conceding them to have been signed by Oren Ruffcorn, alleged that he had no authority to do so. Appellee insists the genuineness of the signature was not put in issue. ■ By section 3640 of the Code the signature is to be “deemed genuine and'admitted, unless the person whose signature the same purports to be shall, in a pleading or writing filed within the time allowed for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Burlington Plow Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Mulligan v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  3. Shipley v. ReasonerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Beach v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Robinson v. LairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Traer v. Lucas Prospecting Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. City Deposit Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Thayer v. Smoky Hollow Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Goodman Manufacturing Co. v. Mammoth Vein Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API