Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Pillot

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1937No. 1673-6834PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Commissioner.

Writ of error was granted in this case upon the holding of the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals that the statement hereafter quoted of the trial judge to the jury was harmless error. The background of the point at issue was as follows: The City of Houston filed suit against Pillot et al. seeking to condemn for street purposes a strip of land approximately 80x417 feet. Damages were claimed by Pillot et al. in a large sum.

On the first trial the verdict was for $49,000 for the value of the strip taken, with no damages to the remaining prop*871erty. Judgment for this amount was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wichita Valley Railway Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. City of Houston v. PillotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Pillot v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Shasta Oil Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. City of Alamo v. Casas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. City of Houston v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. State v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API