Legal Opinion
State v. Scarborough
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 27, 1964No. 7597PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHADICK, Chief Justice.
This is an eminent domain action. The judgment in a condemnation suit awarding landowners’ damages for diminution in value of two small residual tracts is affirmed.!
The State condemned and took 2.4 acres out of a 3.9 acre tract of land belonging to Mr. and Mrs. J. D. Scarborough. The. award made to compensate for the acquired acreage is not questioned. . Evidence .was offered to show damage to the 1.5 acre residue. The State in this excerpt from its brief suggests the nature of the damage claimed, to-wit: “Study of the record has revealed * * * only four things' which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Tennessee Gas & Transmission Co. v. ZirjacksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Interstate Northborough Partnership v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- City of Houston v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Texas Electric Service Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Grant v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.