Legal Opinion

Lauhoff v. Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided August 29, 1944No. 343-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, copartners as Lauhoff Grain Company, sue to recover under two policies insuring against loss of use and occupancy, each for $40,000. One expired June 6, 1943, the other October 15, 1943. The policies covered the plant, machinery and equipment of plaintiffs in Chicago Heights, all of which, except the building, was removed to Danville in the summer of 1942. Plaintiffs rely upon an oral contract to transfer the executed policies to the Danville location. Defendant denies that any valid contract was ever made. It is a member of the so-called “Aetna group”…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. CaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Ætna Insurance v. MaguireIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Insurance Company v. McCainSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elmore v. BlumeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Kalman v. BertacchiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Sanborn v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Granite State Fire Ins. Co. v. MittonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. LeberisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API