Legal Opinion
Precourt v. Driscoll
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 1, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
I. In cross-examination the plaintiff Susan was asked if she remembered having a certain question put to her and giving a certain answer to it in her deposition which had been taken. Objection was made on the ground that she should first be asked if it was her deposition, having it shown to her, and her attention then called to the part of it upon which she was being examined. The inquiry was allowed and the plaintiffs excepted.
As stated, only two points of objection were made, one, that the witness should identify the deposition, and the other, that she should not be required to state her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Robinson v. ConeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
- Fitzpatrick v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Sackheim v. . PigueronNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Thomas Iron Co. v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Patch v. Stanley WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Lachman v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.