State v. Putzier
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The attempted appeal in. this criminal case is anomalous in that it requires a rather complete statement to make its" nature appear.
By information defendant was charged with an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor August 15, 1930, in the “said county” of Meeker. On arraignment December 4, 1930, defendant pleaded not guilty. Thereafter, December 30, 1930, that plea was withdrawn for the purpose of demurring to the information. That was done and the demurrer overruled. His counsel being asked whether defendant desired to plead further, the reply was in the negative and that he desired a stay of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Folsom v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- State v. WestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State v. NoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State v. AbrischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. HoelzelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. HoelzelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000