Legal Opinion

State v. Weston

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Oertiorari to reA'iew an order of the district court for Blue Earth county, Dickinson, J., presiding, denying the defendant’s motion for a change of venue.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of murder. In the court below he made an application, upon affidavits, for an order changing the venue. This application was denied, whereupon he sued out a writ of ■certiorari to remove the proceedings to this court for review. A return having been made, and the matter coming on for argument in this court, we are met by the preliminary question, will a writ of certiorari lie to remove to this court, for review, an intermediate order or decision of the district court in a criminal case?

The statute regulating the removal of causes for review provides…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Asplund v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. State ex rel. Lawton v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. State v. NoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  4. State v. NoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  5. State v. PutzierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API