Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murnane Associates, Inc. v. Harrison Garage Parking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 1997Published

1Dissent

Balio, J. (dissenting in part).

I respectfully dissent in part. I disagree with the majority’s analysis of Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v Wyoming County Indus. Dev. Agency (85 NY2d 281) and with the majority’s conclusion that the construction of the public parking garage was not a public improvement within the meaning of State Finance Law § 137 (1).

Section 137 provides that, in any contract involving the construction of a public improvement, the municipal corporation must require each contractor to post a labor and material payment bond. The purpose of that requirement is to provide "alternative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Carrier v. Salvation ArmyNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Chittenden Lumber Co. v. Silberblatt & Lasker, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v. Wyoming County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Pennex Aluminum Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API