Legal Opinion

Carrier v. Salvation Army

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1996PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Levine, J.

The narrow issue presented by this appeal is whether Social Services Law § 460-d grants residents of an adult care facility subject to Department of Social Services supervision a private right of action to seek the appointment of a temporary receiver. Because we agree with the courts below that there is no such right under the statute, we now affirm.

Plaintiffs, residents of an adult care facility known as Booth House II, brought an action against the operator, defendant Salvation Army, for the appointment of a temporary receiver pursuant to Social Services Law §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Brian Hoxie's Painting Co. v. Cato-Meridian Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Varela v. Investors Insurance Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Henry v. IsaacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits.Com, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Cruz v. TD Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Mark G. v. SabolNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Carr v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. Negrin v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API