Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v. Wyoming County Industrial Development Agency
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
The issue here is whether a construction project developed with the assistance of an industrial development agency is properly considered a "public improvement” under State Finance Law § 137 requiring alternative bonds to insure that suppliers of goods and services will receive payment. Because we hold that the subject project is not a "public improvement” within the meaning of the statute, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division.
In 1988 defendant Indeck Energy Resources of Silver Springs, Inc., a privately owned company, entered into an installment sale…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Chittenden Lumber Co. v. Silberblatt & Lasker, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v. Wyoming County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by13 opinions
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dormitory Authority-StateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Harsco Corp., Patent Construction Systems Division v. Gripon Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Matter of Indeck-Corinth L.P. v. Assessor for the Town of CorinthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Murnane Associates, Inc. v. Harrison Garage Parking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- American Architectural, Inc. v. MarinoNew York Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.