Legal Opinion

Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v. Wyoming County Industrial Development Agency

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1995PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The issue here is whether a construction project developed with the assistance of an industrial development agency is properly considered a "public improvement” under State Finance Law § 137 requiring alternative bonds to insure that suppliers of goods and services will receive payment. Because we hold that the subject project is not a "public improvement” within the meaning of the statute, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division.

In 1988 defendant Indeck Energy Resources of Silver Springs, Inc., a privately owned company, entered into an installment sale…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Chittenden Lumber Co. v. Silberblatt & Lasker, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v. Wyoming County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dormitory Authority-StateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Harsco Corp., Patent Construction Systems Division v. Gripon Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Matter of Indeck-Corinth L.P. v. Assessor for the Town of CorinthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Murnane Associates, Inc. v. Harrison Garage Parking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. American Architectural, Inc. v. MarinoNew York Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API