Legal Opinion

State v. Lopez

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 12, 1995No. 15186PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the trial court’s order rectifying a transcript pursuant to Practice Book § 4051, without affording the defendant an evidentiary hearing, was consistent with the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment *489to the federal constitution.1 On April 9,1992, the defendant, Rafael Lopez, was convicted, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).2 The defendant was sen*490tenced to a fifteen year term of imprisonment on that charge on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. In re Samantha C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API