Nehan v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN J. THARP, Jr., United States District Judge
The plaintiff, Beugre S. Nehan, alleges that his employer, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (“Tootsie Roll”), discriminated against him on the basis of his race, national origin, and disability, and retaliated against him for having engaged in protected conduct. Tootsie Roll now moves for summary judgment on all counts. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
I. Background
A. Nehan’s Compliance with Local Rule 56.1
As an initial matter, Tootsie Roll requests that the Court strike from the record an enumerated list…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Denise Coleman v. Patrick R. DonahoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burrell v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Modjeska v. United Parcel Service Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Blackford v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Downing v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Quevedo v. Top-Line Furniture Warehouse CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018