Legal Opinion

Blackford v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 12, 2015No. 13 C 8761Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge:

Now before the Court is Defendant Federal Express Corporation’s (“FedEx”) motion for summary judgment brought pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the following reasons, FedEx’s motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

According to Northern District of Illinois Local Rule 56.1, “all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party [for summary judgment] will be deemed to be admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party.” L.R. 56.1. Plaintiff William Blackford, III (“Blackford”) has not filed an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Hedrick G. Humphries v. Cbocs West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Silverman v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API