Legal Opinion
Intellivision v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 23, 2011No. 07 Civ. 4079(JGK)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Intellivision and its three principals, Bruce Adams, Paul Hoffman, and John Daniels, have asserted claims against the defendant, Microsoft Corp. (“Microsoft”), relating to a 2001 contract in which Microsoft obtained the rights to several patent applications. The plaintiffs allege that Microsoft made fraudulent or negligent misrepresentations that induced them to enter into the contract, and that Microsoft breached a fiduciary duty created by the contract. Microsoft moves for summary judgment, arguing principally (a) that the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Northern Shipping Funds I, LLC v. Icon Capital Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- F.O. ex rel. O. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Jalee Consulting Group, Inc. v. Xenoone, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Bear Stearns Asset ManagementDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Ride, Inc. v. APS Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.