Legal Opinion

MacK Outer Drive Improvement Ass'n v. Merrill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1947No. Docket No. 4, Calendar No. 43,523PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Pursuant to Act No. 36, Pub. Acts of 1929 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13903 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 27.501 et seq.]), plaintiffs instituted suit to obtain a declaratory decree to the effect that three lots owned by defendant were subject to a certain building and use restriction. Following a hearing on the merits, the trial judge decreed that the restriction governed the use of defendant’s lots. Defendant has appealed.

All of the parties except the corporate plaintiff own lots in Grosse Pointe Manor subdivision. The corporate plaintiff is composed of property owners in Grosse Pointe Manor subdivision,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swan v. MitshkunMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Moore v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Taylor Avenue Improvement Ass'n v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Monroe v. MenkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Austin v. Van HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rofe v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Redfern Lawns Civic Ass'n v. Currie Pontiac Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Scott v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API