Legal Opinion

Hordin v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 1945No. 19787PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause comes to this court on questions of law and fact, the plaintiff claiming the right to bring this action as a taxpayer and seeking to enjoin the defendants from carrying out the provisions of certain contracts which it is claimed were entered into contrary to law.

The Cleveland Railway Company as a part of the business of providing streetcar and bus service to the citizens of Greater Cleveland contracted for the services of advertising specialists to procure advertising matter from various business concerns and to place the same in spaces provided therefor in its streetcars and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North v. Higbee Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. Monongahela Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Eastern Advertising Co. Ex Rel. Southern Street Railway Advertising Co. v. George K. McGaw & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. Doria v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Ward v. American Health Food Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yellow Cab of Cleveland, Inc. v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Foss v. SpitznagelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Allerton Parking Corp. v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Eikenbary v. City of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Price v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API