Legal Opinion

Marvel v. Phillips

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1894PublishedCited by 29 opinions

- Appeal from a decree of the Probate Court, dismissing a petition for the conveyance, by the executors of the will of ■William H. Phillips, of certain letters patent to a trustee. The case was heard by Knowlton, J., and reserved for the consideration of the full court; such decree to be entered as law and justice might require. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAller, J.

The plaintiff, having invented an improvement in conveyors and an improved elevator, for which he had applied for letters patent, assigned his inventions to Phillips, the defendants’ testator, taking from him an agreement in writing, by which Phillips agreed: “1. To pay all expenses of said applications and of obtaining said letters patent of the United States. 2. To manage the business for the joint benefit of both; to advance all funds requisite, but to look to the business for repayment, but to hold full title for the benefit of both until Marvel shall join in a change of title, and to use…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. People v. Globe Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Wells v. CalnanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Spalding v. . RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Butterfield v. ByronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hawkes v. KehoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Huffman v. RicketsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Kowalski v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Smith v. Estate of PrestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Blakely v. SousaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API