Richardson v. Checker Acquisition Corp. (In re Checker Motors Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINTS WITH PREJUDICE AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINTS
JAMES D. GREGG, Chief Judge.
I.JURISDICTION
This court has jurisdiction over this bankruptcy case. 28 U.S.C. § 1334. This case and all related proceedings have been referred to this court for decision. 28 U.S.C. § 157(a); Local Rule 83.2(a) (W.D. Mich.). These adversary proceedings are statutory core proceedings because the plaintiff seeks to determine, avoid or recover fraudulent conveyances or preferences. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F) and (G).
Notwithstanding the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richardson v. Checker Acquisition Corp. (In re Checker Motors Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013