Legal Opinion

United States v. McClarty

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 16, 1911No. 7,609PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Criminal proceeding by the United States by indictment against Clinton C. McClartv. On demurrer to indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, District Judge.

The indictment in this case contains three counts, each of which is based upon sections 5440 and 5209 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3676, 3497), which sections embrace the applicable statutory provisions in force in 1908, when, it is alleged, the offenses charged were committed. The accused, then the president of the National Banking Association known as the First National Bank of Louisville, Ky., has demurred to each count in the indictment. Very shortly slated, it is charged in the first count:

First. That “the said McOlarty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. United States v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. United States v. FurlongSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  4. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. Jerry MeekerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Jianole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Cardinal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. United States v. HigginsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API