Legal Opinion
Jianole v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 1, 1924No. 6336PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
The defendant Jianole was prosecuted on an indictment for conspiracy in violation of section 37 of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10201), in that he and one Longnecker unlawfully conspired to violate title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St-. Ann. Supp. 1923, §§ lOUSi^-lOlSS1/^), to unlawfully possess and to unlawfully transport intoxicating liquor in the city of Omaha, Neb. Both were convicted, and this appeal is prosecuted by Jianole alone.
Fifteen errors are assigned, and we will discuss those «worthy of consideration in order.
The first is that the evidence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Paris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Vernon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- United States v. James Melvin WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Montgomery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.