Legal Opinion

Cardinal v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1931No. 9075PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Adolphus Cardinal lives on a farm of three hundred and twenty acres situated sixteen miles north of St. Paul, Minn. Appellant Ray Cardinal is his son, and lives upon another farm of seventy-six acres. This latter tract also is the property of Adolphus Cardinal, and is situated one and one-half miles from the latter’s home. Appellant Archie Cardinal, son of Adolphus Cardinal, twenty years old, lives with his father. Adolphus Cardinal had placed his son Ray on this seventy-six acre tract; it was known as the Ray Cardinal farm, and the father intended…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Rudd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  5. Turinetti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Boston Dicks and Alfred Copeland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. DellaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. LaBergeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  5. Nazzaro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API