Legal Opinion

Alwood v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1917No. 8271PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by JR. S. Alwood and another against Isabelle Harrison and Ed Haiiiison, with affidavit of attachment, in which R. B. Leeka intervened. Motion to dissolve attachment sustained, motion ro set aside the judgment and order and for a new rrial overruled, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

On February 25, 1916, plaintiffs in error, hereinafter styled plaintiffs, instituted this action in the district court of Creek county to recover upon* á promissory note executed by Isabelle 'Harrison and Ed Harrison, two of the defendants in error, hereinafter Called de-ifendants, to the plaintiffs in error, which said note is dated December 1, 1914, for the sum of $8,000 payable two years after date, the payment of which said note was secured by a mortgage upon lands in Custer county, and real estate in Kansas, which said mortgage, as averred in the petition, contained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owings v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. White v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Core v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Board of Trustees of Westminster College v. PeirsolSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Phillips v. Williams Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baird v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bollenbach v. LudlumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Durham v. RascoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Wilson v. KirchanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Poultrymen's Service Corp. v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API