Legal Opinion

Bollenbach v. Ludlum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1921No. 10417PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Beckham County; T. P. Clay, Judge. Action by Huida Ludlum against Kathrina Bollenbach, executrix of the estate of Jacob Bollenbach, on note and mortgage. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment thereof, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against Adolph Bollenbach, Ena Boll-enbach. and Kathrina Bollenbach, executrix of the estate of Jacob Bollenbach, deceased. The note and mortgage were executed by Adolph Bollenbach and Ena Bollenbach to Jacob Bollenbach, who transferred the same to the plaintiff, indorsing his name in blank on the back of the note.

Subsequent to the indorsement of the note Jacob Bollenbach, the payee, died, and Kath-rina Bollenbach was duly appointed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westlake v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Oklahoma City Development Co. v. PicardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Phillips v. Williams Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Alwood v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. F. B. Collins Inv. Co. v. SannerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lincoln Mortgage Investors v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Maulitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Wheeler v. American Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Wester v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API