United States v. Harry Bechtel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This court has been advised that the appellant died in Mesa, Arizona on December 20, 1976, while direct review of his criminal conviction was pending. Had Durham v. United States, 401 U.S. 481, 91 S.Ct. 858, 28 L.Ed.2d 200 (1971), been overruled in its entirety by Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325, 96 S.Ct. 579, 46 L.Ed.2d 531 (1976), the question whether the cause should be remanded to the district court as law and justice require might now be an open one. We do not understand Dove v. United States, however, as overturning the rule that “death pending direct review of a criminal…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Durham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dove v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
4Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. RiccobeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. William DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Don C. Davis, United States of America v. Daniel M. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Rick PaulineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Marcel Raymond OberlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.