Legal Opinion

Durham v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 8, 1971No. 5928PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner was convicted of having knowingly possessed a counterfeit $20 bill. After the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed his conviction he filed this petition for a writ of certiorari. We are now advised that petitioner has died.

It is true that the petition for certiorari is out of time under our Rule 22 (2), though timeliness under our rules, of course, presents no jurisdictional question. Subsequent to the affirmance of his conviction below, petitioner filed a timely petition for rehearing. Upon his inquiry to the Court of Appeals he was informed that he would be notified as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Dorothy Crooker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. PomeroyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pipefitters Local Union No. 562 v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Dove v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Henry Albert SteevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. Hampton v. DittySupreme Court of the United States · 1973

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API