Legal Opinion

Dodge v. Bruccoli, Clark, Layman, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 16, 1999No. 2942PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, Judge:

Bruccoli, Clark, Layman, Inc. and its insurance carrier, Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company (collectively referred to as Bruccoli), appeal the circuit court’s reversal of the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission ruling that George Dodge'was no longer entitled to additional medical benefits under S.C.Code Ann. § 42-15-60 (1985). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

George Dodge was a computer programmer at Bruccoli. In 1989 Dr. Parrott performed surgery on Dodge for a spinal stenosis and a herniated disc with right radiculopathy into the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Banner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Dykes v. Daniel Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  3. Sanders v. Litchfield Country ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Scruggs v. Tuscarora Yarns, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Williams v. Boyle Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bass v. Kenco GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Lee v. Harborside CaféCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Gadson v. Mikasa Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Hall v. United Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Gattis v. MURRELLS INLET VFW 10420Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API