Legal Opinion

Intel Corp. v. Future Link Systems, LLC

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 3, 2017No. C.A. No. 14-377-LPSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

STARK, U.S, District Judge:

Pending before the Court are four summary judgment and Dmbert motions: (1) Future Link Systems, Inc.’s (“Defendant,” “FLS,” or “Future Link”) motion for summary judgment (D.I, 520); (2) Intel Corporation’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Intel”) motion for summary judgment that U.S. Patent No. 7,478,302 is indefinite and that Intel does not infringe U.S. Patent Nos.,-5,754,867; 6,052,754; 6,317,804; and 5,870,570 (D.I. 522); (3) Future Link’s motion to preclude expert testimony1 (D.I. 526); and (4) Intel’s motion for summary judgment of no *609willfulness and no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply Sirona Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2026
  2. Powerhouse Communications, LLC v. Midstate Communication Contractors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API