Intel Corp. v. Future Link Systems, LLC
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, U.S, District Judge:
Pending before the Court are four summary judgment and Dmbert motions: (1) Future Link Systems, Inc.’s (“Defendant,” “FLS,” or “Future Link”) motion for summary judgment (D.I, 520); (2) Intel Corporation’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Intel”) motion for summary judgment that U.S. Patent No. 7,478,302 is indefinite and that Intel does not infringe U.S. Patent Nos.,-5,754,867; 6,052,754; 6,317,804; and 5,870,570 (D.I. 522); (3) Future Link’s motion to preclude expert testimony1 (D.I. 526); and (4) Intel’s motion for summary judgment of no *609willfulness and no…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply Sirona Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Powerhouse Communications, LLC v. Midstate Communication Contractors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025