Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re GRAND JURY

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 11, 2009No. 08-1880Published

1DissentHoward, Circuit Judge

Neither the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure nor Supreme Court precedent specifically address the circumstances in which a non-defendant grand jury witness may access his testimony, regardless of the format of such access. The panel majority adopts an approach based on the reasoning and rationale of a recent D.C. Circuit opinion, which permits relatively unfettered access even for non-defendant witnesses. Were we writing on a blank slate, I believe this approach would be problematic. But we are not writing on a blank slate; an unbroken line of our cases *24going back over thirty years…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API