Legal Opinion
Ptak v. General Electric Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 11, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. Super. 573 (1951)
85 A.2d 214
MARGARET PTAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 3, 1951.
Decided December 11, 1951.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys).
Mr. William Rossmoore argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Morton Stavis, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, S.J.A.D.
The Workmen's Compensation Division dismissed the petitioner's claim at the close…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bollinger v. Wagaraw Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Cauco v. GalanteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Liondale Bleach, Dye & Paint Works v. RikerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Hall v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Stone v. Dugan Brothers of N.J.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McKeever Custom Cabinets v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- King v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Theodore v. Dover Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Snoden v. Watchung BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Buzza v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.