Legal Opinion

Snoden v. Watchung Borough

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 11, 1953PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

29 N.J. Super. 41 (1953)

101 A.2d 583

ANNE SNODEN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

BOROUGH OF WATCHUNG, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 24, 1953.

Decided December 11, 1953.

Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.

Mr. Samuel P. Orlando argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Messrs. Orlando, Devine & Tomlin, attorneys).

Mr. John W. O'Brien argued the cause for petitioner-respondent (Messrs. O'Brien, Brett & O'Brien, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.

Appellant borough appeals from the whole of the final judgment…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Seiken v. Todd Dry Dock, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Lohndorf v. Peper Bros. Paint Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  3. Lohndorf v. Peper Bros. Paint Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  4. Van Ness v. Borough of HaledonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  5. Ptak v. General Electric Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fink v. PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Jacobs v. KaplanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Crotty v. Driver-Harris Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Loew v. Borough of Union BeachNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API