Snoden v. Watchung Borough
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
29 N.J. Super. 41 (1953)
101 A.2d 583
ANNE SNODEN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
BOROUGH OF WATCHUNG, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 24, 1953.
Decided December 11, 1953.
Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.
Mr. Samuel P. Orlando argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Messrs. Orlando, Devine & Tomlin, attorneys).
Mr. John W. O'Brien argued the cause for petitioner-respondent (Messrs. O'Brien, Brett & O'Brien, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.
Appellant borough appeals from the whole of the final judgment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Seiken v. Todd Dry Dock, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Lohndorf v. Peper Bros. Paint Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
- Lohndorf v. Peper Bros. Paint Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Van Ness v. Borough of HaledonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Ptak v. General Electric Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fink v. PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Jacobs v. KaplanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Crotty v. Driver-Harris Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Loew v. Borough of Union BeachNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.