Legal Opinion
Hall v. Doremus
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 23, 1934PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was deliveréd by
Heher, J.
The primary question here presented is whether respondent, while in the'employ of prosecutors, suffered injury by an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment, within the intendment of paragraph 7 of section 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation act. Pamph. L. 1911, pp. 134, 136.
The essential facts follow: Respondent was employed as a laborer on a farm maintained by prosecutors at Towaco, in the county of Morris. His duties were general in character'— such as are ordinarily rendered by farm laborers. On the day in question,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROADSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sanders v. Jarka Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Williams v. Western Electric Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Roberts v. Dredge FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Simon v. RHH Steel Laundry, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Mills v. Monte Christi Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.