Legal Opinion
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 26, 1997No. CV 96-7438 DDP (ANx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiffs Claims and Related Relief
PREGERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lockheed’s motion for leave to amend its complaint came before this Court on September 15,1997. After reviewing and considering the materials submitted by the parties and hearing oral argument, the Court denies the motion.
I. Background
For over 50 years, Plaintiff Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”) has operated “Skunk Works,” an aerospace development and production facility. Lockheed owns the federally registered “SKUNK WORKS” service mark.1
In March 1996, Lockheed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- IMCO General Construction v. DCK Pacific GuamSuperior Court of Guam · 2018
- L1 Technologies, Inc. v. ChekanovDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020