Legal Opinion
L1 Technologies, Inc. v. Chekanov
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 16, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00259Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 L1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; Case No.: 20-cv-00259-H-JLB SYNCWISE, LLC; and PIXELS 15 MATTER, LLC, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 16 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND Plaintiffs, THE COMPLAINT 17 v. 18 SERHII CHEKANOV; DMITRY [Doc. No. 18.] 19 FATEEV; ROMAN KOLESNIKOV; and VEBERFOC, INC., 20 Defendants. 21 22 On February 11, 2020, Plaintiffs L1 Technologies, Inc., Syncwise, LLC, and Pixels 23 Matter, LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against Defendants Serhii 24 Chekanov, Dmitry Fateev,1 Roman…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.