United States v. Jerry Pollard (98-5908) and Eddie Rodriguez (98-6118)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSiler, J., joined by Alan E. Norris, J.,
NATHANIEL R. JONES, J. (pp. 649-50), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Jerry Pollard and Eddie Rodriguez appeal their convictions after entering conditional guilty pleas of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On appeal, the defendants argue the district court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence because they claim the arresting officers illegally searched a residence in effecting their arrest. The government contends that the defendants lack standing to challenge the search of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Steven Eugene Smith, Randy Ray SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- United States v. RhigerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.