Floyd v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
In this case plaintiff in error was charged with the offense of deserting his minor child and withholding from said child the means of support.
There is no testimony in the record showing that the defendant either had or could procure employment by which he could provide for the support of the child. The testimony shows that the defendant in the court below and his wife, who was the prosecuting witness in the case, were married sometime in 1929 and the child was born April 21, 1930. The record further shows that the wife, both before and after her marriage, lived with her parents and that she…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Stedman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- People ex rel. Demos v. DemosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Brooke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- People ex rel. Feeney v. DershemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DarnellSupreme Court of Florida · 1970