Legal Opinion

Stedman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 15, 1920PublishedCited by 21 opinions

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Alachua County; James T. Wills, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

Plaintiff in error, referred to herein as defendant, was charged in an indictment with unlawfully deserting his wife, Mandy Stedman, and unlawfully withholding from his said wife and his minor child, Lillie Mae Stedman, the means of support, there not then and there existing such cause or causes as are recognized as ground or grounds for divorce.

The indictment is in two counts. The desertion of the wife is charged in the first count, and the withholding of means of support from both the wife and child is charged in the second count.

*550Upon a trial of the case the following verdict was returned :…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. State v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Licata v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. Brooke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. McBrayer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API