Legal Opinion
Bognar v. Zayre Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 26, 1988No. C86-3392PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge.
Before this Court are several matters. Plaintiffs have moved for both assessment of costs and prejudgment interest, and also have filed their notice of intention to take depositions in support of a bad faith negotiation claim. Conversely, Defendant has moved for a new trial and also has served notice of deposition duces tecum on Plaintiffs’ counsel. These matters will be addressed separately.
Plaintiff seeks costs pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 54(d) and has presented details of taxable costs totaling $1,196.95 in this action. Rule 54 provides for costs “as of course to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Kalain v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Allied Chemical Corporation v. Jack MacKay D/B/A MacKay Farms Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Mills v. City of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Novak v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. Oluyemisi Muinat LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Deaton v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Denny Yakas v. Kmart Corporation, D/B/A Kmart Discount Department Store 9525Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991