Ertman v. Liberty State Bank

The appellant claims that the court erred in changing the answers of the jury to the questions submitted to them and that on the findings of the jury and the undisputed evidence he is entitled to judgment for the amount of his deposit.

We are constrained to hold upon careful examination of the record that the findings of the jury designated (1) and (2) in the statement of facts are clearly supported by the evidence. To substantiate this it is only necessary to quote briefly from the plaintiff’s testimony. He testified:

“I told him (the banker) that whenever the papers were all fixed up and this…