Legal Opinion

State v. Holbrook

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 19, 1975No. 45267PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was charged with unlawful sale of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell, Minn. St. 152.09, subd. 1(1), and a jury found him guilty of the charge of unlawful possession with intent to sell. Defendant, who is on parole from a maximum indeterminate term of 5 years’ imprisonment, contends upon this appeal from judgment of conviction and denial of post-trial motion that (1) there was insufficient evidence of possession with intent to sell, and (2) admission of evidence of his prior imprisonment deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Security Bank of Pine Island v. HolstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. State v. RichmondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. State v. CoreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. HaglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. JuelfsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. State v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API