Legal Opinion

New England Laminates Co. v. Murphy

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1974PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert A. Oppido, J.

Defendant, Fortin Laminating Corp. (hereinafter referred to as Fortin), a Delaware corporation, has moved, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 8), for an order dismissing this action as to it upon the ground that this court lacks in personam jurisdiction over Fortin. This matter was set down for a hearing by order of Mr. Justice Meade.

The issue before this court is whether plaintiff has shown enough to establish: (1) that defendant, Fortin, is doing business in New York sufficient for in personam jurisdiction, pursuant to CPLR 301; or (2) that the defendant, Fortin, is transacting or has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co. v. Dytron Alloys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Irgang v. Pelton & Crane Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Mountain States Sports, Inc. v. SharmanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1972
  4. Chunky Corporation v. Blumenthal Bros. Chocolate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Lebensfeld v. TuchNew York Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
  2. Stark Carpet Corporation v. M-Geough Robinson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. Holness v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Beckett v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Fosen v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API