Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Vick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerlihy, J.

The facts are not in dispute. The claimant filed for benefits under the law effective as of July 14, 1958. Thereafter through her own efforts she obtained work starting September 5,1958 and terminating September 12, 1958. During the week ending September 7 she earned $24.50. Subsequently she mailed to the board a “ back to work card ” for the week ending September 7 and for the dates September 6 and 7 put an “ N ” in the boxes Avhich signified she did not Avork and also she failed to signify in the proper place on the card the amount of wages earned during the week. She testified that Avhen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BernsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. In re the Claim of BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In re the Claim of ValvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. In re the Claim of PettyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Anderson v. Western Dakota InsurorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In re the Claim of ForbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API