Legal Opinion
Lazar v. Casale (In Re Casale)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 24, 1983No. 1-19-40567PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BORIS RADOYEVICH, Bankruptcy Judge.
By notice of motion filed 18 October, 1982, and returnable 28 October, 1982, Eugene Eisenberg, Bellmore, N.Y., acting as attorney for the above-named objecting creditors, requests reimbursement for litigation costs expended, and compensation for professional services rendered, in successfully denying Antonio Casale the benefit of his Chapter 7 discharge.
The creditors’ attorney bases his fee application upon the provisions within 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(3). 1 The movant’s papers recognize that the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (hereinafter “the Code”) does not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Helvering v. HammelSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Calumet Realty Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re BlountUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2002
- In Re Godon, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2002
- Matter of RomanoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1985
- Matter of SpencerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.