Legal Opinion
Matter of Romano
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided September 9, 1985No. Bankruptcy 81-1646PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON AMENDED FEE APPLICATION OF CREDITORS AND OBJECTION TO AMENDED FEE APPLICATION
ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge.
THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon an Amended Fee Application of Creditors filed by Marta M. Romano and Charles F. Clark, Esq., (Movants) and upon Objection to the Amended Fee Applications filed by David Romano, the Debtor in the above-styled Chapter 11 case. The movants seek an award of expenses and attorney fees pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(3) and (4). The allowance sought is for services rendered in connection with recovery of certain property for the benefit of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In The Matter Of Futuronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- In Re Richton International Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In Re Consolidated Motor Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In Re GeorgeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Andrew v. Coopersmith (In Re Downtown Investment Club III)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re McLean Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- In Re BlountUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2002
- In Re Godon, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2002
- In Re Washington Lane AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.