Legal Opinion

Doe v. City of Chi.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided September 27, 2018No. 18 C 3054PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ronald A. Guzmán, United States District Judge

For the reasons explained below, the City of Chicago's motion to dismiss certain claims is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Five Jane Doe plaintiffs brought this action against their employer, the City of Chicago (the "City"). Plaintiffs work as paramedics for the Chicago Fire Department (the "CFD"). Four of them allege that they have been sexually harassed and intimidated by superiors, and one alleges that she received the same treatment from a colleague. According to plaintiffs, the CFD, as a pattern or practice, has allowed sexual…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Cincinnati Life Insurance Comp v. Marjorie BeyrerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fairley v. McDonald's CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. Hinton v. Vonch, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Perez v. Cook County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API