Legal Opinion

Williamson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1914No. 2969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape on a girl under fifteen years of age and his punishment assessed at twenty-five years in the penitentiary.

It would serve no useful purpose in this, or any other case to recite the evidence. It was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, although appellant himself testified, positively denying any act of intercourse with the girl. This was all for the jury and the lower court and we can not disturb the verdict.

It is shown that after the trial began and four jurors had been accepted, being passed upon separately under a special…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Battles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Ex Parte MarshallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Potter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Muldrew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Ex parte PruittCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API