Legal Opinion

Ex parte Pruitt

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1917No. 4652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original application for' writ of habeas corpus by Walter Pruitt.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, J.

The relator was charged by indictment with the offense of burglary, which is a felony. He filed in the district court a written sworn statement that he was under 17 years of age, as required by article *3931195, C. C. P., and proved by evidence that he was under 17 years old. Thereupon the court dismissed the prosecution, and the complaint and information were filed charging that the relator was a delinquent child and a male person under the age of 17 years, and stating additional facts sufficient to allege that he had committed a burglary. On his trial before a jury he was found guilty of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re a Writ of Habeas Corpus for SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ex Parte MarshallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. In re TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Miller v. BryantNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Link v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hogue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Ex parte McLoudCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. McRuffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Ex Parte LittleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API