Legal Opinion
Purex Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Company, and the Clorox Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1979No. 76-3205Published
1Opinion of the Court
596 F.2d 881
1979-1 Trade Cases 62,675
PUREX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, and the Clorox Company,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 76-3205.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 11, 1979.
John L. Endicott, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert K. Wrede, Los Angeles, Cal., Daniel M. Gribbon, Washington, D. C., Powell McHenry, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before HUFSTEDLER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT,* District Judge.
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.