Legal Opinion

People v. Sanford

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Matthew D’Emic, J.

*181Procedure

Defendant is charged with manslaughter in the second degree, criminally negligent homicide, reckless endangerment in the first degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, and assault in the third degree. The charges stem from the death of defendant’s mother, Clarise Gray, on September 16, 2003. Defendant moves to dismiss the indictment pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 210.20 (1) (b) in that the evidence presented to the grand jury was not legally sufficient to establish the offenses charged or any lesser included offense.

Evidence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. BoutinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. Ricardo B.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. LevesqueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. People v. GalatroNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. RyanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2013
  3. People v. SanfordNew York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API