Legal Opinion

People v. Lauria

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1967No. Crim. 11661PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleming, J.

In an investigation of call-girl activity the police focused their attention on three prostitutes actively plying their trade on call, each of whom was using Lauria’s telephone answering service, presumably for business purposes.

On January 8, 1965, Stella Weeks, a policewoman, signed up for telephone service with Lauria’s answering service. Mrs. Weeks, in the course of her conversation with Lauria’s office manager, hinted broadly that she was a prostitute concerned with the secrecy of her activities and their concealment from the police. She was assured that the operation of the service was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Backun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. In Re: Aimster Copyright LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. United States v. John Scotti, United States of America v. Robert RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. People v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API