Legal Opinion
Shoemake Ex Rel. Guardian v. Ferrer
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 2010No. 81812-6PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
225 P.3d 990 (2010)
Andrea SHOEMAKE, by and through a GUARDIAN ad litem to be appointed, and Keith Shoemake, and their marital community, Respondents,
v.
R. Douglas P. FERRER and Jane Doe Ferrer, husband and wife, Petitioners.
No. 81812-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 22, 2009.
Decided February 4, 2010.
John Woodruff Rankin Jr., Reed McClure, Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.
Robert B. Gould, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
STEPHENS, J.
¶ 1 This case presents an issue of first impression involving a determination of damages for legal malpractice. After he admitted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Savage v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pamela Sue Hook v. Tito Trevino, Individually, and Tito Trevino D/B/A Trevino Law OfficesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- In re the Marriage of FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Schmidt v. CooganWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Badgley Mullins Turner, Pllc App./x-resp. v. Leslie Spencer & Tammy S., Blakey, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- In re the Suspension of WelcomeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.